![test cricket scoring explained test cricket scoring explained](https://c.ndtvimg.com/2021-06/p5vl5ga8_devon-conway-afp_625x300_03_June_21.jpg)
Is that good or bad? Well, it depends on the state of the game. So one team has 236 runs and has lost 5 wickets. With a baseball score of 5-2 it is very clear which team is on top, but if you follow cricket you have to work things out for yourself. Note immediately that this is different from just about any other sport in the world, because it does not tell you who is winning. (Australians, because they live upside down, will write the same score as 5-236). A cricket score is generally expressed in the form of 236-5, meaning that the team batting has 236 runs and has lost 5 wickets. The most important thing is, of course, the overall score in the game.
#Test cricket scoring explained how to
But, just as not everyone who follows baseball knows how to read a box score, the numbers pumped out by cricket commentators have a jargon of their own and need a little explanation at times. It is also a game with a long history, and much time is spent talking about great players of the past. It's almost impossible," he told ESPNCricinfo.Like baseball (and gridiron), cricket is a game that is obsessed with statistics.
![test cricket scoring explained test cricket scoring explained](https://images.indianexpress.com/2013/12/india-vs-new-zealand.jpg)
It'll make it incredibly difficult for New Zealand to make a comeback. And I don't think there's anything wrong with it. However, India bowled only 28-29 overs and yes Kohli could've chosen to opt for follow-on and make huge inroads into New Zealand. Mainly to rest bowlers because of managing their workload. "Most captains around the world sort of tend to urge towards not enforcing the follow-on. Meanwhile, contrary to Laxman's opinion, former New Zealand captain Daniel Vettori felt that it was a move to manage bowlers' workload. Pujara finished day 2 with 29 off 51 as India took their lead well past 300 in Mumbai.ĪLSO READ: NZ legend gives verdict on Kohli's decision to not enforce follow-on India opened with Pujara alongside Mayank Agarwal in the second innings after Shubman Gill had incurred an injury on his arm while fielding on day 2. It's the third day of the Test match not the fourth day,” he said.įollow LIVE Blog here: India vs New Zealand Live Cricket Score, 2nd Test, Day 3 I think they will reassess at tea time, but I would have been Kohli or Dravid, I would have wanted them to bat all day. You want Pujara and Kohli to get their magic three-figure mark which has eluded them for a long time.
![test cricket scoring explained test cricket scoring explained](https://img1.hscicdn.com/image/upload/f_auto/lsci/db/PICTURES/CMS/313800/313850.6.png)
#Test cricket scoring explained series
“The reason Virat Kohli and Rahul Dravid didn't enforce a follow-on because they wanted their batsmen to spend more time on the wicket and get runs under their belt because the South Africa series is not too far away. He also added that he expects India to bat all through the day 3. Talking to Star Sports ahead of start of Day 4 in Mumbai, Laxman explained that the move will give Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara an opportunity to score their much-eluded three-figure mark. But he didn't and fans on social media questioned his strategy, but former Indian cricketer VVS Laxman on Sunday explained that with the South Africa Test series around, he too would have wanted his batters to get some runs under their belt ahead of the crucial overseas contest. But when the bowlers dismantled New Zealand for just 62, with the visitors 263 behind, most, if not all, expected the Indian skipper to enforce a follow-on. Virat Kohli was never a fan of of enforcing a follow-on.